Nigel Eric Williams v. Bruce Edwin Aho
Plaintiff: Nigel Eric Williams
Defendant: Bruce Edwin Aho
Case Number: 2:2016cv02088
Filed: March 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In light of plaintiff's showing, defendant Bruce Edwin Aho is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before February 27, 2017, why his answer should not be stricken for failure to comply with his discovery obligations. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/27/2017. (jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nigel Eric Williams v. Bruce Edwin Aho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Edwin Aho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nigel Eric Williams
Represented By: Christopher B Yeh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?