Linda Woods v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Linda Woods v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Linda Woods
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2016cv02124
Filed:	March 29, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2017	Filing 27 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs and Expenses 26 : IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay the amount of $8,750.00 for fees, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)
September 11, 2017	Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Linda Woods against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 24 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding t his case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2017

Filing 27 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs and Expenses 26 : IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay the amount of $8,750.00 for fees, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)

September 11, 2017

Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Linda Woods against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 24 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding t his case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Linda Woods v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Timothy R Bolin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Woods
Represented By:	Eliot R Samulon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?