Maren Miller v. Tri Marine Fish Company et al
| Maren Miller |
| Cape Finisterre Fishing LLC, Cape Finisterre Fishing, LP, Does, Tri Marine Fish Company, Tri Marine Fishing Management, LLC and Tri Marine Management Company LLC |
| 2:2016cv02203 |
| March 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Marine |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. 46 (ake)
|
|
Filing
25
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Judge John A. Kronstadt 11 . For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion is DENIED. Consistent with the order made during the June 27, 2016 hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Report on or before July 7, 2016, in which they state their collective and/or respective views as to the following issues: (i) an agreed upon settlement method in this action, and the status of that process; (ii) the most efficient manner in which to proceed with this action in light of the pending arbitration in the Philippines where certain parallel issues apparently have been presented; (iii) whether Defendants intend to file a motion to compel arbitration and the anticipated dat e of its filing; and (iv) what discovery Plaintiff seeks regarding arbitrability should Defendants bring a motion to compel arbitration, and the expected amount of time to complete such discovery so that a response to a motion to compel can be presented. Upon review of the Joint Report, the Court will set further dates in this matter, which may include those that would apply in the event that the matter is not remanded or arbitrated. (pso)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DKT. 11) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge John A. Kronstadt. The motion hearing is held. The Court sets its tentative views and is inclined to deny Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (the "Mot ion"). Counsel address the Court. The Court takes the Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. The scheduling conference is held. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of the case and the parties' June 17, 2016 Joi nt Report. The court defers setting final dates, but tentatively suggests the following: Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off 4/10/16. Last day to file motions 5/22/17; Last day to hear motions 8/7/17; Anticipated ruling on all motions 9/11/17; Last day to f ile all pretrial documents 10/2/17; Final Pretrial Conference, Status Conference re Disputed Exhibits, and Hearing on Motions in Limine 10/16/17; Jury Trial (est. tbd days) 10/31/16. See Civil Minutes for Specifics. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
