Susan Schoepp v. McKesson Corporation et al
| Susan Schoepp |
| Does, Eli Lilly and Company and McKesson Corporation |
| 2:2016cv02253 |
| April 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (ECF No. 62 ) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Frcp, hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE t he entire action, including Plaintiff's Complaint, any and all claims and counterclaims which were or could have been asserted by the parties in the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 35), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by June 13, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing w ill be held. All other dates and deadlines in this actionare VACATED and taken off calendar, including parties pending Motions toRemand and Transfer Venue. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (vv)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: POTENTIAL TRANSFER TO COORDINATION TRIAL JUDGE (JCCP 4825) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Parties are to respond, in writing, to the above questions, including by joint stipulation, by April 18, 2016. A request by Defendant to remand this matter and transfer the case to the coordination trial judge will be considered a valid response to this Order. All other dates and deadlines in this action REMAIN on calendar (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
