Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
Unicolors, Inc. |
Does and H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. |
2:2016cv02322 |
April 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 330 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 68 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. having accepted the Offer of Judgment of H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P., pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 327 , thi s Court now enters judgment as follows: (1) Judgment is entered against H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P. and in favor of Unicolors, Inc. in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000), inclusive of all damages, disgorgement, penalties, legal fees, and costs of any kind including attorney fees and expert fees, and pre-judgment interest associated with this action. (2) Plaintiff has no further claim for damages, costs of suit, attorney fees, expert fees, or recovery of any kind in this action. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 289 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the amount of $780,774.80 which reflects (a) damages of $266,209.33 for solely domestic United States product sales, (b) attorneys' fees of $508,709.20, and (c) costs of $4,856.27); and Post-judgment interest is awarded against H&M as prescribed by law. (Case CLOSED.) (jp) |
Filing 267 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT ORDERS AND ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR UNICOLORS AGAINST H&M AS FOLLOWS: 1. Unicolors owns a valid copyright and registration for design EH101; 2. H&M is liable for the willful copyright infringement of Uni colors' design EH101; 3. Judgment is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the amount of two hundred and sixty-six thousand two hundred and nine dollars and thirty three cents ($266,209.33), which reflects solely domestic Unite d States sales; and 4. Unicolors is the prevailing party in this action for purposes of 17 U.S.C. § 505 and is entitled to seek recovery of its costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to said section and Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) |
Filing 29 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. In re: re Stipulation for Protective Order 28 . (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (mkr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.