Thomas E. Perez v. Matig Corporation et al
| Thomas E. Perez |
| Michael Ameri, Angels Recycling, Amita Duggal and Matig Corporation |
| 2:2016cv02903 |
| April 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff shall also have and recover from the defendants, jointly and severally, the additional amount of $ 65,000 as liquidated damages hereby found to be due u nder the FLSA. (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). On or before February 1, 2020, a check or money order with the firm name and "OT/CMP" written thereon payable to the order of "Wage and Hour Div., Labor," in the amount of 6;5,005.64 in payment of the civil money penalty assessed against the defendants for overtime pay violations plus interest. It is further ORDERED that each party shall bear its own fees and other expenses incurred by such party in connection with any stage of this proceeding, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, which may be available under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended. (jp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
