United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Westgate Barrington Company et al
| United African-Asian Abilities Club |
| Does, E and S Ring Management Corporation, Westgate Barrington company and Westgate Brentwood Company |
| 2:2016cv02914 |
| April 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PLAINTIFF show cause in writing not later than July 27, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants WESTG ATE BARRINGTON COMPANY; WESTGATE BRENTWOOD COMPANY; and E AND S RING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument shall not be heard in the above matter unless so order ed by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of briefs. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the following: 1) An answer by the above-named defendants or plaintiffs application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to the above-named defendants on or before the above date, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. (clee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
