CitiMortgage, Inc v. Candida Mobley Wright et al
CitiMortgage, Inc |
Angelline Faaputu Afo, All Persons Unknown Claiming, Durell Coleman, Does, Barbara Donahue, Tonia Franklin, Benny Harris, Jules Howard, Jr., Maria Navarro, Jimmy Lee Nicholas, Tony Rumford and Candida Mobley Wright |
2:2016cv02920 |
April 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S. Fischer |
Frederick F. Mumm |
Real Property: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 215 JUDGMENT ON MORTGAGE, INC.'S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO THE FOLLOWING CAUSES OF ACTION: (1) QUIET TITLE (ad of 4/25/2007); (2) CANCELLATION; AND (3) DECLARATORY RELIEF by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated).(SEE JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
Filing 212 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT ON CAUSES OF ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF CITIMORTGAGE, INC. AND DEFENDANT CANDIDA MOBLEY WRIGHT 205 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (See judgment for further details) (yl) |
Filing 205 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(B) AGAINST DEFENDANT BARBARA DONAHUE by Judge Dale S. Fischer, Related to: REQUEST for Entry of Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) 202 (SEE JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/8/2016. (dp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.