Star Fabrics Inc v. Bizz Inc et al
| Star Fabrics Inc |
| Bizz Inc, C'est La Vie, Does, Lulu's Fashion Lounge Inc and Sweet People Apparel Inc |
| 2:2016cv02984 |
| May 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: This Court having granted the motion by Plaintiff Star Fabrics, Inc. for default judgment against Defendant C'est La Vie by order dated 5/17/2017 69 , and Plaintiff having accepted an Offer of Judgment from Defen dants Sweet People Apparel, Inc. and Dillard's, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 65 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant C'est La Vie in the total amo unt of $30,000 in statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. Section 504(c), plus $2400 in attorneys' fees, and $722.85 in costs; and against Sweet People Apparel, Inc. and Dillard's Inc. in the amount of $45,000, the sum of whic h shall be paid by Sweet People, inclusive of the total of any and all money damages that may be awarded against Sweet People and Dillard's, together with any portion of Star Fabrics' attorneys' fees and costs which it may be entitled to recover from the lawsuit's inception to the date of the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment. Defendants Sweet People and Dillard's are further permanently enjoined and restrained from infringing or making any unauthorized use of the copyrighted work that is the subject of Star Fabrics' claims. Star Fabrics' claims against Sweet People and Dillard are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
57
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 56 . (sp)
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 30, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant C'est La Vie for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant C'est La Vie if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)- Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee.The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 26, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant C'est La Vie. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant C'est La Vie if the above mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
|
Filing
26
(IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee.The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 7, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Lulu's Fashion Lounge, Inc. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Lulu's Fashion Lounge, Inc. if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
