Sarah M. McKeon et al v. Armando Monares Perez et al.
| Sarah M. McKeon and Christopher D. Sutton |
| Guillermina Monares, John Doe Monares, Armando Monares Perez and Jane Doe Perez |
| 2:2016cv03212 |
| May 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Motor Vehicle |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. Pursuant to the Court's October 11, 2016 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by this Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
6
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause by Judge George H. King. Review of the docket in the above-captioned action indicates that Defendants Armando Monares Perez, Jane Doe Perez, Guillermina Monares, and John Doe Monares have not been timely served. Se e Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (requiring service of defendants within 90 days of filing). Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause, in writing, within 14 days hereof, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect timely service. Failure to timely and adequately show cause will be deemed Plaintiffs' abandonment of this action, and their claims against Defendants will be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with our Order. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
