City Prints, LLC v. Destination Maternity Corporation et al
| City Prints, LLC |
| Destination Maternity Corporation, Does 1 through 10, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Holdings Corp. |
| 2:2016cv03233 |
| May 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| S James Otero |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) Mailed closing report to Copyright Office. (lc) |
Filing 28
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE #27 by Judge S. James Otero (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 27 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero: The Court has reviewed the Notice of Settlement of Action #25 filed 08/10/2016, indicating that Plaintiff has reached a settlement agreement with all Defendants in thisaction and that the Parties are in the process of memorializing the terms of the agreement and should be in a position to file a dismissal of this matter within 30 days. Accordingly, the Court continues the Scheduling Conference and sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal hearing on Monday, September 26, 2016 8:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint status report by September 19, 2016. If the parties file the appropriate dismissal pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41 prior to this hearing date, the Scheduling Conference and OSC hearing will be vacated. (lc)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Settlement of Action filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge S. James Otero. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for Monday, August 29, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Rule 26(f) report on or before August 15, 2016. (See attached document for other requirements.) (lom)
|
|
Filing 23
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vv)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Gina Louise Durham on behalf of Defendants Destination Maternity Corporation, Sears Holdings Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Attorney Gina Louise Durham added to party Destination Maternity Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Gina Louise Durham added to party Sears Holdings Corp. (pty:dft), Attorney Gina Louise Durham added to party Sears, Roebuck and Co.(pty:dft))(Durham, Gina) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Destination Maternity Corporation, identifying (No parent corporation). (Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Destination Maternity Corporation.(Portelli, Anthony) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge S. James Otero: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Defendants Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Sears Holdings Corp. to substitute Anthony L. Portelli as attorney of record instead of Matthew D. Pearson is hereby GRANTED. CONDITIONED THAT ALL DATES SET SHALL REMAIN. (vv)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co., identifying Corporate Parent - Sears Holding Corp. (Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sears Holdings Corp., identifying (none). (Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendants Sears Holdings Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co..(Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Anthony L. Portelli in place of attorney Matthew D. Pearson filed by Defendants Sears Holdings Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Anthony Louis Portelli added to party Sears Holdings Corp. (pty:dft), Attorney Anthony Louis Portelli added to party Sears, Roebuck and Co.(pty:dft))(Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Destination Maternity Corporation answer now due 6/27/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Destination Maternity Corporation.(Attorney Anthony Louis Portelli added to party Destination Maternity Corporation(pty:dft))(Portelli, Anthony) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sears Holdings Corp. answer now due 6/24/2016; Sears, Roebuck and Co. answer now due 6/24/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Sears Holdings Corp. ; Sears, Roebuck and Co..(Attorney Matthew D Pearson added to party Sears Holdings Corp. (pty:dft), Attorney Matthew D Pearson added to party Sears, Roebuck and Co.(pty:dft))(Pearson, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC, upon Defendant Destination Maternity Corporation served on 5/16/2016, answer due 6/6/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Victoria Ramirez, Agent Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC, upon Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. served on 5/13/2016, answer due 6/3/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vivian Imperial, Person Authorized to Receive (CT Corporation System) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC, upon Defendant Sears Holdings Corp. served on 5/13/2016, answer due 6/3/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vivian Imperial, Person Authorized to Receive (CT Corporation System) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (jy)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Destination Maternity Corporation, Sears Holdings Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by City Prints, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC, (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17805635 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff City Prints, LLC. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party City Prints, LLC(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
