Brian D. Gee v. Charter Communications LLC
Petitioner: Brian D. Gee
Respondent: Charter Communications LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv03276
Filed: May 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. Wu. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian D. Gee v. Charter Communications LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charter Communications LLC
Represented By: Taylor Stephen Ball
Represented By: Henry E Farber
Represented By: Jacklina A Len
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian D. Gee
Represented By: Juan Carlos Ochoa Diaz
Represented By: Nayla K Wren
Represented By: Steven Douglas Wyllie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?