Colleen M. Clark v. Carolyn W. Colvin
||Colleen M. Clark
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||May 18, 2016
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Philip S. Gutierrez
||Alexander F. MacKinnon
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 15, 2017
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 29 , IT IS ORDERED that attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") are awarded in th e amount of SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,200.00) for all legal services rendered by Plaintiff's attorney in this civil action under 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) and costs in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00) under 28 U.S.C. §1920, subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (wr)
|September 11, 2017
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Colleen M. Clark against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 27 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reman ding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?