Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Rudyak et al
| Jackson National Life Insurance Company |
| Daniel Rudyak and Ludmila Rudyak |
| Regina Rudyak, Estate of Leonid Rudyak and Roes |
| 2:2016cv03439 |
| May 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 64
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT ON INTERPLEADER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation for Judgment on Interpleader #63 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: The Interpleaded Funds in the amount of $1,008,453.97 deposited with the court shall be distributed as follows: (a) a disbursement of $100,000.00 to Ludmila Tretiakova; (b) a disbursement of $908,453.97 to Daniel Rudyak. All interest, if any, earned on the Interpleaded Funds following the deposit of the Interpleaded Funds with the court ("post-deposit interest") shall be distributed by the court as follows: (a) a disbursement equal to 100% of the post-deposit interest to Daniel Rudyak. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
| Filing 63 STIPULATION for Settlement filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 62 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Cross-Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Glickstein, Paula) |
|
Filing 61
ORDER ALLOWING CROSSCLAIMANT LUDMILA RUDYAK, TO AMEND CROSS-CLAIM TO ADD CROSS-DEFENDANTS REGINA RUDYAK AND DANIEL RUDYAK AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATORS OF THE WILL OF LEONID RUDYAK #59 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (See order for details.) (kti)
|
| Filing 60 First AMENDED CROSSCLAIM against Defendant and Cross-Defendant Daniel Rudyak amending Crossclaim, filed by Defendant and Cross Complainant Ludmila Rudyak(Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 59 STIPULATION to Amend filed by Cross-Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Glickstein, Paula) |
|
Filing 58
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER STRIKING ANSWER FILED ON BEHALF OF ESTATE OF LEONID RUDYAK; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STIPULATION TO AMEND CROSS-CLAIM TO ADD CROSS-DEFENDANTS REGINA RUDYAK AND DANIEL RUDYAK AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF LEONID RUDYAK; AND VACATING 3/17/17 STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 3/2/2017, this Court ordered attorney Paula S. Glickstein, Esq. to show cause why the Answer to Ludmila Rudyak's crossclaim filed by attorney Glickstein on behalf of crossdefendant Estate of Leonid Rudyak should not be stricken because the proper cross-defendant was, instead, Regina Rudyak and Daniel Rudyak, Special Administrators of the Estate of Leonid Rudyak ("OSC") #55 . On 3/10/2017, attorney Glickstein filed her response to the OSC stating that she did not oppose the striking of the Answer #57 . IT IS ORDERED as follows: The Answer to crossclaim filed by the Estate of Leonid Rudyak #50 is stricken. The parties are granted leave to file a stipulation no later than one week from this order to allow cross-claimant Ludmila Rudyak to amend her crossclaim to add cross-defendants Regina Rudyak and Daniel Rudyak as Executors of the Will of Leonid Rudyak. The Status Conference set for 3/17/2017 is VACATED. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 57 DECLARATION of Paula S. Glickstein Pursuant to March 2, 2017 order filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 56 STATUS REPORT JOINT filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Glickstein, Paula) |
|
Filing 55
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ESTATE'SANSWER TO CROSS-CLAIM SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Show Cause Response due by 3/10/2017.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 54 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Crossclaim #49 by Clerk of Court. The docket entry indicates that it is an answer filed by the Estate of Leonid Rudyak ("Estate") to Ludmila Rudyak's cross-claim. Instead, however, counsel for the Estate has re-filed Ludmila Rudyak's cross-claims (which were already filed on 7/20/16) without leave of Court and, attached thereto, is what purports to be the answer of the Estate. As such, it is an improper filing and is ordered STRICKEN. (mrgo) |
| Filing 53 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Claim #48 by Clerk of Court. The docket entry indicates that it is a claim by Ludmila Rudyak. Instead, however, is it Ludmila Rudyak's answers to claims filed by the Estate. The docket does not reflect the filing of any claims by the Estate. Accordingly, Doc. # 48 is STRICKEN. (mrgo) |
| Filing 52 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Cross-Defendant Ludmila Rudyak's Answer to Cross-Complaint in Interpleader filed by Estate of Leonid Rudyak #48 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: The docket does not appear to reflect the filing of a Cross-Complaint by Estate of Leonid Rudyak. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (clee) |
| Filing 51 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Cross-Defendant, Estate of Leonid Rudyak's Answer to Cross-Claim of Ludmila Rudyak #49 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: The filer attached as the Main Document, Defendant Ludmila Rudyak's Cross Claims, which was previously filed on 7/20/2016 as document number #15 . The Estate of Leonid Rudyak's Answer to Cross-Claim of Ludmila Rudyak is Attachment 1. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (clee) |
| Filing 50 * STRICKEN * ANSWER to Crossclaim #15 filed by Cross-Defendant Estate of Leonid Rudyak.(Glickstein, Paula) ** DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO THE CIVIL MINUTES OF 3/14/2017 #58 ** Modified on 3/14/2017 (gk). |
| Filing 49 [DOCUMENT ORDERED STRICKEN PER DOC. NO. 54] ANSWER to Crossclaim #15 filed by Cross-Defendant Estate of Leonid Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Redacted Document)(Attorney Paula S Glickstein added to party Estate of Leonid Rudyak(pty:crd))(Glickstein, Paula) Modified on 3/2/2017 (mrgo). |
| Filing 48 [DOCUMENT ORDERED STRICKEN PER DOC. NO. 53] CLAIM filed by Cross-Defendant Ludmila Rudyak. (Cass, Paul) Modified on 3/2/2017 (mrgo). |
|
Filing 47
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISCHARGING OSC AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Dolly M. Gee re: Order to Show Cause, #36 . (Status Report due by 3/10/2017. Status Conference set for 3/17/2017 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 46 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Ludmila Rudyak, Served on Daniel Rudyak served on 01/06/2017. (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 45 MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. The case is called and appearances are made. The Court confers with the parties. The parties are unable to reach a settlement of the case. Court Recorder: CS 01/06/17. (sbou) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE TO PARTIES by Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Effective, January 4, 2017, Judge Walsh will be located at the Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, COURTROOM 790 on the 7th floor, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 790 of the Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mail box located outside the Clerk's Office on the 1st floor of the Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. Magistrate Judge Walsh's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Isabel Martinez, may be reached at (213) 894-8958. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 43 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Cross Claimant Ludmila Rudyak. Amendment to Amended Document (Non-Motion) #39 Proof of Service (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Proof of Service #39 . The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 41 DECLARATION of Paul L. Cass re Response, #38 in Support of Plaintiff's Response to Courts Order to Show Cause Dated 12/1/2016 Setting Case RE: Dismissal Against Estate of Rudyak for Lack of Prosecution filed by Cross Claimant Ludmila Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Cross-Complainant Ludmila Rudyak aka Ludmila Tretiakova Substitutes in as a Cross-Defendant in this Action as Doe #1, Regina Rudyak and Daniel Rudyak Special Administrators of the Estate of Leonid Rudyak)(Cass, Paul) |
|
Filing 40
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) re Order Setting Settlement Conference by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. This matter having been referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for a settlement conference, IT IS ORDERED that a settlement conference be held on January 6, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., 312 N. Spring Street, Courtroom 23 (3rd Floor), Los Angeles, CA. The parties, lead trial counsel, and persons whose consent is necessary to conclude a settlement are required to attend the settlement conference. (See document for further details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 39 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Cross Claimant Ludmila Rudyak. Amendment to Response, #38 AMENDED Proof of Service ONLY (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 38 RESPONSE filed by Cross Claimant Ludmila Rudyak (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in Support of Opposition to Order to Show Cause, #2 Exhibit Exhibits to Cass Declaration, #3 Declaration Declaration in Support of Opposition to Order to Show Cause, #4 Exhibit Declaration in Support of Opposition to Order to Show Cause)(Cass, Paul) |
|
Filing 37
ORDER RE MEDIATION DATES #35 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, having considered the parties stipulated request to modify the previously ordered mediation dates, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: This case is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for settlement proceedings. The early mediation deadline is continued from December 2, 2016 to February 15, 2017. The deadline for the parties Joint Report re Results of Early Mediation is continued from December 9, 2016 to February 22, 2017. The parties shall comply with the Courts Scheduling and Case Management Order [Doc. #31 ], filed on September 13, 2016, except to the extent it has been modified herein. (clee)
|
|
Filing 36
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders cross-claimant(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 15, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to cross- defendant Estate of Leonid Rudyak. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by crossclaimant(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to cross-defendant Estate of Leonid Rudyak if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
| Filing 35 First STIPULATION to Reschedule ADR filed by defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge Dolly M Gee. Effective October 31, 2016, Judge Gee will be located at the 1st Street Courthouse, COURTROOM 8C on the 8th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 8C of the 1st Street Courthouse, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mail box outside the Clerk's Office on the 4th floor of the 1st Street Courthouse. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company, re Notice (Other) #29 served on 8-25-16. (Bockman, Craig) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case for Settlement Conference. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 12/2/16 (early mediation); 1/16/18. Joint report re results of early mediation due by 12/9/16; joint report re settlement due by 1/23/18; no appearance necessary. (iv)
|
|
Filing 31
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR COURT TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Amended Pleadings due by 12/16/2016. Discovery cut-off 11/7/2017. Exhibit List due by 2/9/2018. Motions in Limine to be filed by 1/18/2018. Motions due by 11/17/2017. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/9/2018. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 1/16/2018. Status Report due by 1/23/2018. Witness List due by 2/9/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/20/2018 at 2:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Court Trial set for 3/20/2018 at 9:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL & TRIAL DATES WORKSHEET) (iv)
|
| Filing 30 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Rule 26 Joint Statement ; estimated length of trial 3-4, filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak.. (Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Deposit of Funds With Court by Plaintiff filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Deposited $1,008,453.97. (gk) |
|
Filing 28
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER STRIKING THE JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On August 19, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Rule 26(f) report #22 , but did not attach a worksheet as required by the Court's July 20, 2016 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) #11 . On August 22, 2016 the Court ordered the parties to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report and attach the worksheet by no later than August 29, 2016 #25 . On August 23, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, but attached an incomplete worksheet without any dates or deadlines as required by the Court's July 20, 2016 Order #27 . According, the parties Joint Rule 26(f) report with the incomplete worksheet is hereby STRICKEN. The parties are reminded that the deadline to submit a Joint Rule 26(f) report with a completed worksheet is August 29, 2016. (iv)
|
| Filing 27 ***STRIKEN*** JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3, filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Glickstein, Paula) Modified on 8/24/2016 #28 (iv). |
| Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #22 , Answer to Crossclaim #24 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected. The correct event is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: See document no. 24: The attorney and name of party on the on the title page is not the same as the caption. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lom) |
|
Filing 25
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On July 20, 2016, the Court set a Scheduling Conference #11 . As required by the Court's July 20, 2016 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching a worksheet (Exhibit A). To date, the worksheet has not been filed. The Scheduling Conference set for hearing on September 2, 2016 is continued to September 16, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching the worksheet attached to the Court's July 20, 2016 Order, by no later than August 29, 2016. (iv)
|
| Filing 24 ANSWER filed by Cross-Defendant Daniel Rudyak.(Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 23 Cross-Defendant Ludmila Rudyak's ANSWER to Cross-Complaint in Interpleader Filed by Daniel Rudyak filed by Cross defendant Ludmila Rudyak.(Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 22 Rule 26 Joint Report filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak (Glickstein, Paula) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FOR DEPOSIT OF INTERPLEADED FUNDS AND FOR DISCHARGE OF STAKEHOLDER JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY by Judge Dolly M. Gee, re Stipulation for Discharge #20 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company will deposit the amount of $1,008,453.97 with the court clerk, which funds are to be deposited by the clerk in an interest bearing account; (see document for further specifics). (mrgo)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Discharge of Stakeholder Jackson National Life Insurance Company filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bockman, Craig) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #18 . The following error(s) was found: Defendant Rudyak filed an Answer and Cross-Claim on 7/19/2016. Notice of Interested Parties submitted as a separate PDF attachment to this entry, and should have been docketed separately. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties)(Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Defendant Daniel Rudyak's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Interpleader Complaint andCross-Claim filed 7/19/2016 #10 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 16 21-Day Summons Issued re Crossclaim #15 as to Crossdefendants Daniel Rudyak, Estate of Leonid Rudyak, and Roes 1-50, inclusive. (gk) |
| Filing 15 CROSSCLAIM against Cross-Defendants Daniel Rudyak, filed by defendant Ludmila Rudyak.(Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint In Interpleader.(Attorney Paul L Cass added to party Ludmila Rudyak(pty:dft))(Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ludmila Rudyak. (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 11 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Scheduling Conference set for 9/2/2016 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (clee) |
| (DUPLICATE ENTRY) CROSS-CLAIM against Crossdefendant Ludmila Rudyak filed by Defendant and Crossclaimant Daniel Rudyak. (Answer and Cross-Claim filed as one document, see document number 10) (gk) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Answer and Cross Claim filed by Defendant Daniel Rudyak.(Attorney Paula S Glickstein added to party Daniel Rudyak(pty:dft))(Glickstein, Paula) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. upon Daniel Rudyak waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/20/2016, answer due 7/19/2016. Waiver of Service signed by Daniel Rudyak. (Bockman, Craig) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (clee)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Daniel Rudyak, Ludmila Rudyak. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company, identifying Prudential PLC. (Schaefer, Austin) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Schaefer, Austin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Schaefer, Austin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17843369 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Austin D Schaefer added to party Jackson National Life Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Schaefer, Austin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
