WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al
| WBS, Inc. |
| Artists Worldwide, Inc., Does, Stephen Pearcy, Curtis Strong, Kijrsten Strong, Strong Marketing Group, Top Fuel Nation and Watercraz Marketing Strong |
| 2:2016cv03495 |
| May 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff WBS, Inc., that plaintiff take nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and that defendants STEPHEN PEARCY and ARTISTS WORLDWIDE, INC. recover its costs, under FRCP 54(d); 28 USC Section 1920. (shb)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 89 . Based on the Courts ruling the following motion and requests are resolved and deemed moot. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 100 , Joint Request for Ruling on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 109 , and Joint Request for Ruling Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 114 . (shb)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 70 , 72 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc). Modified on 2/10/2017 (lc).
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 13, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidenc e that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by defendants; Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by this Court. (Local Rules 7-1 and 7-2.) (clee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
