Maria Neumayer v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al
Maria Neumayer |
Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Insurance Company and Does |
2:2016cv03508 |
May 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Alka Sagar |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY DECREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Allstate Insurance Company and against Plaintiff Maria Neumayer on the Complaint filed by Maria Neumayer; (2) Plaintiff Maria Neumayer take nothing by way of her Complaint; and (3) Defendant Allstate Insurance Company shall be awarded its reasonable costs as decided by the Clerk of the Court upon the submission of a timely Application to Tax Costs in compliance with California Central District Local Rules, Local Rule 54 et. seq. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 24 MINUTES [In Chambers] Order DENYING Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. 15 ) and GRANTING Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 6 ) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: The Court: DENIES Plaintiff Motion for Remand, and GRANTS Defendant Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Claim for Breach of Contract. The breach of contract claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.