L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. Spatz Laboratories
Plaintiff: L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Defendant: Spatz Laboratories
Case Number: 2:2016cv03572
Filed: May 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 80 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Stipulation for Protective Order 78 . (See Order for complete details) (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. Spatz Laboratories
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Represented By: Dennis S Ellis
Represented By: Katherine Frenck Murray
Represented By: Sean Unger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spatz Laboratories
Represented By: Michael Thomas Jones
Represented By: Teodora Manolova
Represented By: Stephen D Poss
Represented By: Rachel Melissa Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?