Michael Euzle Jacques v. McDonald et al
| Michael Euzel Jacques |
| Sheriff Adeppa, Sheriff Hadnot, Sheriff John Doe 1, Nurse John Doe 2, Nurse Lopez, Sheriff Jim McDonald, Sheriff Perez, Sheriff Rios and Nurse Shipman |
| 2:2016cv03599 |
| May 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| George H. Wu |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: Amended Complaint 13 . Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 33 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/3/2017. Plaintiff may discharge this order by doing any one of the following: submitting to the U.S. Marshal more complete USM-285 forms; filing a request for an extension of time to submit more complete USM-285 forms to the Court and U.S. Marshal; or filing a signed document entitled Notice of Voluntary Dismissal dismissing this action. (rh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/2/2017. Plaintiff may discharge this Order by filing one of the following: 1) a request for an extension of time to file copies of the USM-285 forms; 2) copies of the USM-285 forms that were provided to the United States Marshal Service; or (3)a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, that states that Plaintiff mailed the completed USM-285 forms to the U.S. Marshal. Alternativ ely, if Plaintiff does not wish to pursue this action, he may file a document entitled Notice Of Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is further advised that his deadline for completing service of the SAC is February 15, 2017. If Plaintiff does not mail his completed USM-285 forms to the U.S. Marshal by that date, the case may be subject to dismissal under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (rh)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to fi le a First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is explicitly cautioned that failure to timely file a First Amended Complaint, or failure to correct the deficiencies described above, may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is further advised that if he no longer wishes to pursue this action, in whole or in part, he may voluntarily dismiss it, (rh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
