Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.
Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Bros Entertainment Inc |
VidAngel Inc. |
2:2016cv04109 |
June 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Andre Birotte |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 525 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant Rules 54(b) and 58(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., MVL Film Finance LLC, New Line Productions, Inc., and Turner Entertainment Co. and against VidAngel, Inc., in the amount of $62,448,750.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 520 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiffs' Motion 498 , the Court HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS that Defendant VidAngel, Inc. and all of its officers, agents, servants, employees , attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them that receive notice of the Permanent Injunction, ARE PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED re copyrighted works, etc. The Clerk of this Court shall return the Preliminary Injunction Bond (Dkt. 163) to Plaintiffs forthwith. See document for further details. (gk) |
Filing 487 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. See document for details. (gk) |
Filing 230 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), a final partial judgment is hereby entered dismissing Defendant and Counterclaimant VidAngel, Inc.'s First, Second and Third Counterclaims 203 for the reasons set forth in the Order Granting VidAngel's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Dismissing VidAngel's First, Second and Third Counterclaims (ECF No. 266), attached hereto as Exhibit A. (gk) |
Filing 23 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order 21 (NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT) (sbu) |
Filing 20 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Counter-Claimant(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 1, 2016, why this action sho uld not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Counter-Claimant(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.