Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Bros Entertainment Inc
Defendant: VidAngel Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv04109
Filed: June 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 525 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant Rules 54(b) and 58(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., MVL Film Finance LLC, New Line Productions, Inc., and Turner Entertainment Co. and against VidAngel, Inc., in the amount of $62,448,750.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 520 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiffs' Motion 498 , the Court HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS that Defendant VidAngel, Inc. and all of its officers, agents, servants, employees , attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them that receive notice of the Permanent Injunction, ARE PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED re copyrighted works, etc. The Clerk of this Court shall return the Preliminary Injunction Bond (Dkt. 163) to Plaintiffs forthwith. See document for further details. (gk)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 487 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. See document for details. (gk)
October 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 230 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), a final partial judgment is hereby entered dismissing Defendant and Counterclaimant VidAngel, Inc.'s First, Second and Third Counterclaims 203 for the reasons set forth in the Order Granting VidAngel's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Dismissing VidAngel's First, Second and Third Counterclaims (ECF No. 266), attached hereto as Exhibit A. (gk)
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order 21 (NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT) (sbu)
August 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Counter-Claimant(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 1, 2016, why this action sho uld not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Counter-Claimant(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Allyson Bennett
Represented By: Rose Leda Ehler
Represented By: Kelly M Klaus
Represented By: Glenn D Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucasfilm Ltd LLC
Represented By: Allyson Bennett
Represented By: Rose Leda Ehler
Represented By: Kelly M Klaus
Represented By: Glenn D Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Represented By: Allyson Bennett
Represented By: Rose Leda Ehler
Represented By: Kelly M Klaus
Represented By: Glenn D Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warner Bros Entertainment Inc
Represented By: Allyson Bennett
Represented By: Rose Leda Ehler
Represented By: Kelly M Klaus
Represented By: Glenn D Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VidAngel Inc.
Represented By: Jaime W Marquart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?