Shawn Berry v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
| Shawn Berry |
| County of Los Angeles, DOES and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department |
| 2:2016cv04112 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MINUTE (In Chambers): ORDER RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 42 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Plaintiff failed to file any responsive document by May 30, 2017. Accordingly, the Court concludes that summary judgment is appropriate. The Court grants judgment in favor of Defendant County of Los Angeles on each of Plaintiff's claims. This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Pursuant to Local Rule 58-6, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to treat this order, and its entry on the docket, as an entry of judgment. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. In re: Stipulation for Protective Order 27 (mkr)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than October 6, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: Answer by the defendant or an application for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). No oral argum ent on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
