April J. Grundfor v. Janet Bouffard et al
| April J. Grundfor |
| Janet Bouffard, Does, Carey Friend and Stephen Sisk-Provencio |
| 2:2016cv04163 |
| June 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants motion for judgment as a matter of law be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be and hereby is ENTERED in favor of Defendants Janet Bouffard, Carrie Friend, and Stephen Sisk-Provencio and against Plaintiff April Grundfor as to Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall take nothing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear their own costs. Related to: Judgment, 168 . (shb)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER AND JUDGMENT by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr.: For the reasons stated herein, the motion for judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) is GRANTED. It is further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that Judgment is entered in favor of Def endants Janet Bouffard, Carrie Friend, and Stephen Sisk-Provencio and against Plaintiff April J. Grund as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff shall take nothing. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
