Sara Hassman v. Rabbinical Assembly of America et al
| Sara Hassman |
| Bank of America, National Association, Does, Emory University, Michelle Obama, Rabbinical Assembly of America and The Beth Tfiloh Congregation of Baltimore City |
| 2:2016cv04188 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith 22 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed: 1. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and 2. Pursuant to Ru le 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall file a written Response to this Order to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause and show why this action is not frivolous and without merit will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/23/2016.)[See Order for details.] (san)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.