Twin Rivers Engineering, Inc. v. Fieldpiece Instruments, Inc.
| Twin Rivers Engineering, Inc. |
| CHY Firemate Co., Ltd. and Fieldpiece Instruments, Inc. |
| Fieldpiece Instruments, Inc. and Twin Rivers Engineering, Inc. |
| Mike Patterson |
| Twin Rivers Engineering, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv04502 |
| June 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
463
JUDGMENT by Judge Marilyn L. Huff. Accordingly, pursuant to the jurys findings, the Court enters judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs claim for infringement of claim 7 of the 993 patent.The Court previously issued an or der on the parties cross-motions for summary judgment on April 24, 2018. (Doc. No. 368.) In the order: 1. the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff with respect to: (1) Plaintiffs claim for false marking under 35 U.S.C. Section 292; (2) Plaintiffs claim for unfair competition under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act; and (3) Plaintiffs antitrust claim for per se unlawful concerted refusal to deal under 15 U.S.C. Section 1; 2. the Court granted summary adjudicat ion in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs claim for infringement of claims 2, 3, 6, and 9 of the 993 patent; and 3. the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant CHY on CHYs breach of contract counterclaim. (Id. at 37.) In addition, on June 5, 2018, the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant CHY on CHYs promissory estoppel and quantum meruit counterclaims. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
|
Filing
415
ORDER: (1) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS FOR QUANTUM MERUIT AND PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED; AND (2) ORDER RE: PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS by Judge Marilyn L. Huff. (sy)
|
|
Filing
405
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Marilyn L. Huff. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why Docket Entry No. 397 should not be struck for failure to seek leave to file the document at issue under seal. Plaintiff must file a motion for leave to f ile the document under seal by Friday, May 18, 2018, or the Court will strike the document. In addition, the Court notes that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Courts May 1, 2018 order. (Doc. No. 388.) In that order, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file redacted versions of Docket Entry No. 292 and Docket Entry No. 323. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed the redacted versions of those documents. (shb)
|
|
Filing
231
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/27/2017. (mz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
