Asencion Gines Dominguez v. Abel De Luna et al
| Asencion Gines Dominguez |
| Care More Health Services, Inc., Abel De Luna, Does, Enrique Facio, Julio Flores, Patricia Guerrero, Ruben Mondragon and Victor Paramo |
| 2:2016cv04594 |
| June 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| George H. King |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, in favor of Patricia Guerrero against Asencion Gines Dominguez: On November 4, 2016, we dismissed this action without prejudice as to Defendants Abel De Luna, Ruben Mondragon, Victor Paramo, Julio Flores, Enrique F acio, and Care More Health Services, Inc. (Dkt. 17.) On December 21, 2016, we dismissed this action without prejudice as to Defendant Patricia Guerrero, the sole remaining defendant. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
9
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause by Judge George H. King. On June 24, 2016, pro se Plaintiff Asencion Gines Dominguez filed this action against Defendants Abel De Luna, Ruben Mondragon, Victor Paramo, Julio Flores, Enrique Facio, Patricia Guerrero , Care More Health Services, Inc., and Does 1-10. (Dkt. 1.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) a defendant must be served with the summons and complaint "within 90 days after the complaint is filed," or we "must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It has been more than 90 days since the Complaint was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed proof of service as to a ny Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file proper proof of service as to each Defendant within 14 days hereof or else show cause in writing, within the same 14 days, why proper service was not effected. Failure to timely or adequately file proof of service or show cause as set forth above, SHALL be deemed Plaintiff's abandonment of this action, and this action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with our Order. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
