John Keller v. Baughman
Petitioner: John Keller
Respondent: Baughman
Case Number: 2:2016cv04605
Filed: June 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Wilner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE HABEAS ACTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (See Order for details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)
June 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/23/2016. (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 6/24/2016.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Keller v. Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Baughman
Represented By: E Carlos Dominguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?