Raul Tiscareno v. W. L. Montgomery

Petitioner: Raul Tiscareno
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Case Number: 2:2016cv05097
Filed: July 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2017 Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney: IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 21 and this Court's Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 25 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raul Tiscareno v. W. L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Represented By: Taylor T Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Raul Tiscareno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?