Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Davis Wire Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Davis Wire Corporation

Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Davis Wire Corporation

Plaintiff:	Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:	Davis Wire Corporation
Case Number:	2:2016cv05332
Filed:	July 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge:	Philip S. Gutierrez
Nature of Suit:	Environmental Matters

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2017	Filing 26 CONSENT DECREE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Plaintiff, Defendant agrees to: Develop and construct an Environmental Project at the Facility designed such that the Facility will no longer be expected to discharge any pollutants to waters of the United States. Defendant's current estimates put the costs to develop and implement the Environmental Project intended to eliminate all discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity from the Facility at six hundred and fifty thou sand dollars ($650,000.00). Defendant shall pay a total of One Hundred and Ten Thousand Dollars ($110,000) to Waterkeeper to partially reimburse Waterkeeper for its investigation fees and costs, expert/consultant fees and costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of investigating and preparing the lawsuit and negotiating this Consent Decree. SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2017

Filing 26 CONSENT DECREE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Plaintiff, Defendant agrees to: Develop and construct an Environmental Project at the Facility designed such that the Facility will no longer be expected to discharge any pollutants to waters of the United States. Defendant's current estimates put the costs to develop and implement the Environmental Project intended to eliminate all discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity from the Facility at six hundred and fifty thou sand dollars ($650,000.00). Defendant shall pay a total of One Hundred and Ten Thousand Dollars ($110,000) to Waterkeeper to partially reimburse Waterkeeper for its investigation fees and costs, expert/consultant fees and costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of investigating and preparing the lawsuit and negotiating this Consent Decree. SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Davis Wire Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Davis Wire Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Represented By:	Drevet John Hunt
Represented By:	Melissa Lynn Kelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?