Hiram Elixer Summers v. Arnold Eric
Petitioner: Hiram Elixer Summers
Respondent: Warden Arnold Eric
Case Number: 2:2016cv05570
Filed: July 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to this Court's Order Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Action without Prejudice, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this action are dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hiram Elixer Summers v. Arnold Eric
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Arnold Eric
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hiram Elixer Summers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?