Air Lease Corporation et al v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corp.,
ALC B378 37772, LLC, ALC B378 41345, LLC and Air Lease Corporation |
Far Eastern Air Transport Corp., |
2:2016cv05601 |
July 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Michael W. Fitzgerald |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 328 JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment on the merits be entered as follows: As to all remaining claims and counterclaims, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $23,374,200. (iv) |
Filing 327 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald.ALC's total damages award is $23,374,200: (a) $14.6 million for breach of the MSN 41345 Lease, which represents the difference in value between the Far Eas tern and SpiceJet leases on a discounted basis. (b) $800,000 in transition cost damages for breach of the MSN 41345 Lease. (c) $37,100 in remarketing expenses for breach of the MSN 41345 Lease. (d) $6.6 million for breach of the MSN 37 772 Lease, which represents the difference in value between the Far Eastern and SpiceJet leases on a discounted basis. (e) $1.3 million in transition cost damages for breach of the MSN 37772 Lease. (f) $37,100 in remarketing expenses for breach of the MSN 37772 Lease. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.