Nicholas Kozma v. United Of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Nicholas Kozma
Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2016cv05746
Filed: August 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F. MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: The action is dismissed with prejudice. Re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 26 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholas Kozma v. United Of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Kozma
Represented By: Brent Dorian Brehm
Represented By: Glenn R Kantor
Represented By: Alan E Kassan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Martin E Rosen
Represented By: Adam Brooke Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?