Andres Gomez v Harjeet Gill et al
| Andres Gomez |
| Does, Harjeet Gill and SEJ Asset Management and Investment Company |
| 2:2016cv05825 |
| August 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL by Judge Manuel L. Real. This Courts Order Re: Notice to Counsel ORDERS counsel to meet 30 days after the first answeri ng defendant. Plaintiffs counsel is then required to file a Joint Report of Early Meeting within 14 days of the holding of the Early meeting of Counsel. Failure to comply with the Courts Order may lead to the imposition of sanctions which may incl ude the striking of pleadings and entry of judgment or dismissal of the action. The parties in this case have failed to comply with the Courts Order. To date, a Joint Report of Early Meeting has not been filed with the Court. The Court ORDERS the p arties to file an Early Meeting Report or show cause in writing on or before May 2, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Courts Order. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive filing on or before the date upon which a response by the parties is due. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
13
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real.Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 27, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: - Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. - Answer by the defendant(s) or responsive pleading In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (clee)
|
|
Filing
8
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 13, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In acc ordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
