Mylinda Criddell v. Premier Healthcare Services, LLC
| Mylinda Criddell |
| Premier Healthcare Services, LLC |
| 2:2016cv05842 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: The Court grants Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Grant Final Approval and Enter Judgment on Behalf of the Fair Credit Reporting Act Class and to Award Attorneys' Fees and Costs to Class Counsel 59 . The Court enters final judgment in favor of Plaintiff Mylinda Criddell and the Fair Credit Reporting Act class members and against Defendant Premier Healthcare Services, LLC in the amount of 6;247,854.00. The Court has reviewed the arbitration award of attorneys' fees and costs issued 10/27/2017 by Hon. Rosalyn Chapman (Ret.) of JAMS and adopts and enters the award as part of this Final Judgment. As such, the Court orders and adjudg es that Defendant Premier Healthcare Services, LLC shall pay Class Counsel (Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP and Weinhaus & Potashnick) attorneys' fees in the amount of $306,158.00 and litigation costs and expenses in the amount of $26,625.90. The Court dismisses this matter with prejudice. See document for further details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
