Charles Dixon v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Charles Dixon v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Charles Dixon
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2016cv05844
Filed:	August 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge:	Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2018	Filing 36 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 35 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,614.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (bem)
January 10, 2018	Filing 34 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 33 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED and judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor as to his SSI application and the Commissioner's favor as to the DIB application. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2018

Filing 36 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 35 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,614.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (bem)

January 10, 2018

Filing 34 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 33 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED and judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor as to his SSI application and the Commissioner's favor as to the DIB application. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles Dixon v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Dixon
Represented By:	Denise Bourgeois Haley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?