Ninh Dinh Pham v. Starkey et al
Ninh Dinh Pham |
Sheriff Officer Dang, District Attorney Delanie Hicks, Sergeant Morris, Officer Ms. Rose, Sheriff Officer Sather and Sheriff Officer Starkey |
2:2016cv05959 |
August 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A. Oliver |
Otis D. Wright |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, in favor of Branch, Logeman, Opina, Starkey, Rhonda Watson against Ninh Dinh Pham Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 93 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, and this action is dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou) |
Filing 64 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 61 . Accordingly, the Court is not persuaded by Plaintiff's Objections. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions to Amend are DENIED. (dml) |
Filing 45 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II for interim Report and Recommendation (Issued), 40 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Hickss Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Hicks are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. (sbu) |
Filing 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS FAILURE TO FILE NOTICE OF SUBMISSION by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, re Order 14 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must show cause, in writing, on or before January 27, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with Court orders. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a Notice of Submission in accordance with the Court's prior orders. (dml) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.