Venice Baking Company v. Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC et al
| Venice Baking Company |
| Does and Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC |
| 2:2016cv06136 |
| August 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES 32 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court will award $41,999.00 in attorneys fees plus the cost of preparing the motion ($3,780.00) for a total of $45,779.00. This amount does not include the proposed cost of the reply, which was avoided by Plaintiffs nonopposition. (lc)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff shall have until February 23, 2017, to file opposition to thisattorneys fee award. If Plaintiff does not file an opposition by that date, the Court will deem the $45,779.00 award unopposed. (lc)
|
|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill ofcosts. (lc)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 16 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. As detailed above, Plaintiff has not met the requirements for reconsideration or relief. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. (lom)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A CONTINUANCE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 9/22/2016 (lc).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 9 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
