Gary Dempster et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al
Gary Dempster and Sandie Dempster |
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Statebridge Company and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB |
2:2016cv06213 |
August 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
John F. Walter |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Statement Re: Local Rule 7-3 Conference filed on September 6, 2016 [Docket No. 13], counsel represents that Plaintiffs have failed to respond to Defendants' efforts to comply wit h Local Rule 7-3. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Gary and Sandie Dempster individually and as Trustee for the Rancho Trust are ordered to show cause, in writing by September 13, 2016 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $750.00 against Plaintiffs or dismiss this action for their failure to comply with Local Rule 7-3 and paragraph 5(b) of the Court's Standing Order filed August 24, 2016. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Cou rt. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions and dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.