Mi Ok Moon v. Pruco Life Insurance Company et al
| Mi OK Moon |
| Does and Pruco Life Insurance Company |
| Mi OK Moon |
| Pruco Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2016cv06217 |
| August 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J. Standish |
| John F. Walter |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter is hereby entered as follows: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Pruco Life Insurance Company against Plaintiff Mi Ok Moon entire Complaint. Plaintiff Mi Ok Moon shall take nothing on her Complaint. (2) Jud gment is entered in favor of Counter-Claimants Pruco Life Insurance Company on its Counterclaim against Plaintiff Mi Ok Moon. Counter-Claimant properly rescinded life insurance policy number L9038302, which Defendant issued to the insured Jin Hyung Kim in 2014, with a face value of $120,000. That policy is rescinded. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
38
STATEMENT OF DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Pruco is entitled to judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs entire Complaint. Pruco is also entitled to judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff on Pruco Counterclaim. Accordingly, life insurance policy number L9038302, which Pruco issued to the insured Jin Hyung Kim in 2014, with a face value of $120,000, is hereby rescinded. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
