Taidje Rayburn Robinson v. Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Office et al
| Taidje Rayburn Robinson |
| Bill Brown, Santa Barbara County and Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Office |
| 2:2016cv06287 |
| August 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Action, the Complaint and this action are ordered dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mkr)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITHIN 21 DAYS RE: FAILURE TO PAY PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Within 21 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to timely pay the initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff may discharge this order and avoid dismissal by submitting the initial partial filing fee. If Plaintiff claims that he no longer has the funds in his prison account to pay the initial partial fi ling fee, he must submit an updated copy of his prison trust statement showing his deposits, withdrawals, and balance for the past six months. If Plaintiff does not file a timely and satisfactory response to this Order to Show Cause, the court will recommend dismissal of the Complaint for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mkr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
