Jeffery Ayala v. Cox Automotive, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey Ayala |
| Cox Automotive, Inc., Does, Greater Nevada Auto Auctions, LLC, Scott Hurst and Manheim Remarketing, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv06341 |
| August 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff Jeffrey Ayala take nothing from Defendant GNAA and, accordingly, Defendant GNAA is hereby awarded its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Motion to Remand [Dkt. 8] by Judge George H. King denying 8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: Plaintiff's motion to remand (Doc. 8) is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing
12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. King: On the Court's own motion, Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. 8 ), noticed for hearing on 10/24/2016, is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
