Securities and Exchange Commission v. Enviro Board Corporation et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Glenn B. Camp, Enviro Board Corporation, Joshua D. Mosshart and William J. Peiffer |
| 2:2016cv06427 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOSHUA D. MOSSHART by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant Joshua D. Mosshart 26 and th e SEC's Motion To Set a Civil Penalty, Order an Adjusted Disgorgement Amount, and Enter Final Judgment Against Defendant Joshua D. Mosshart 61 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $293,655.00, representing ill-gotten gains obtained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $30,240.41, and a civil penalty amount of $293,655.00 pursuant to Section 20 (d)(2)(A) of the Securities Act and Section 21(d)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act, for a total of $617,550.41. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $617,550.41to the SEC within 14 days after entry of this Judgment. See document for injunctive relief and other details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
60
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT GLENN B. CAMP by Judge Manuel L. Real: Upon Stipulation 56 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Glenn B. Camp is permanently restrained and enjoined, etc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DE CREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $476,550.00, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $23,464.98, and a civil penalty in the amount of $175,000.00 pursuant to Section 20(e) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 77t(e) and Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 78u(d)(2). Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $675,014.98 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. See document for further details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real. THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudi ce to the right, upon good cause shown within 120 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6). (clee)
|
|
Filing
20
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 20, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In ac cordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
