The Rag Place, Inc. v. Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.
Plaintiff: The Rag Place, Inc.
Defendant: Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv06582
Filed: August 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40 ) filed by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ah)
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. In re: Stipulation for Protective Order 26 , Stipulation for Protective Order 27 . (mkr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Rag Place, Inc. v. Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Jeffrey Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Rag Place, Inc.
Represented By: Sang N Dang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?