Michael F Langrock v. Geoff Dean
Petitioner: Michael F Langrock
Respondent: Geoff Dean
Case Number: 2:2016cv06619
Filed: September 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Related to: MEMORANDUM AND Order, 4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael F Langrock v. Geoff Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Geoff Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael F Langrock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?