Kaurloto v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
Kathleen Kaurloto |
Caliber Home Loans Inc., DOES, MTC Financial Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and U.S. Bank, N.A. |
2:2016cv06652 |
September 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J. Standish |
John F. Walter |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 JOINT JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) Defendants are dismissed from the action with prejudice; (2) Judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants; (3) Plaintiff shall take nothing as against Defendants; and (4) Defendants may recover their costs. (Case CLOSED). (jp) |
Filing 32 STATEMENT OF DECISION GRANTING Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff First amended Complaint by Judge John F. Walter that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff First Amended Complaint 26 is GRANTED. Although the Court recognizes that thisCircuit has a liberal policy favoring amendments and that leave to amend should be freely granted, the Court is not required to grant leave to amend if the Courtdetermines that permitting Plaintiff to amend would be an exercise in futility. In this case, Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts in her Opposition that indicates leave to amend would not be futile. Accordingly, Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.