State Farm General Insurance Company v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
| State Farm General Insurance Company |
| DOES |
| Best Buy Stores, L.P. |
| Best Buy Stores, L.P. |
| Penn Ridge Transportation |
| 2:2016cv06682 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| George H. Wu |
| Personal Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER FOLLOWING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: The complaint in this matter is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party to bear its own fees and costs. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
|
|
Filing
39
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H. Wu. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/27/2016. (kss)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu: The Court orders Defendant Best Buy to show cause in writing no later than October 20, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant is reminded that courtesy copies are to be delivered to Chambers. The Court will also entertain any argument the parties wish to present on the issue at the Scheduled Conference. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
