Sterling K. Blanche v. D. Baughman
Petitioner: Sterling K. Blanche
Respondent: D. Baughman
Case Number: 2:2016cv06771
Filed: September 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Scott
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder Denying 1 Request for Enlargement of Time to File Habeas Petition and Administratively Closing Matter. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Petitioner's request for enlargement of time is denied and this matter be administratively closed. (see document for details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (dro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sterling K. Blanche v. D. Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sterling K. Blanche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?