Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. K-Mart Corporation
| Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd, The Regents of the University of California, Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. and Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. |
| K-Mart Corporation |
| 2:2016cv06782 |
| September 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| S James Otero |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 73 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (lc) |
Filing 72
ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION #71 by Judge S. James Otero: 1. The instant action and all claims and counterclaims alleged by any party are dismissed in their entirety. 2. The dismissal is with prejudice with respect to claims arising on or before the date of this Order, and without prejudice with respect to claims arising thereafter. 3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 71 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hyde, Bradley) |
|
Filing 70
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION RELATED DEADLINES, TUTORIAL AND MARKMAN HEARING #69 by Judge S. James Otero: 1. The Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction is continued to June 1, 2017.2. The Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions & Extrinsic Evidence iscontinued to June 12, 2017. 3. The Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement is continued to June 26, 2017. 4. The Completion of Claim Construction Discovery is continued to June 29, 2017. 5. The Technology Tutorial is continued to July 17, 2017 10:00 a.m. 6. Plaintiffs Opening Claim Construction Brief is continued to July 21, 2017. 7. Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief is continued to August 4, 2017. 8. Plaintiffs Reply Claim Construction Brief is continued to August 18, 2017. 9. The Markman Hearing is continued to September 12, 2017 9:00 a.m. (lc)
|
| Filing 69 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Claim Construction Related Deadlines, Tutorial and Markman Hearing filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Day, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 68
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION for Order for Mediation With a Magistrate Judge in the Next Forty-Five (45) Days #65 by Judge S. James Otero (lc)
|
| Filing 67 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: RE Defendant Kmart Corporation's Application for Order of Mediation with a Magistrate Judge in Next 45 Days #65 . Kmart has failed to make the required showing regarding the need to have a Magistrate Judge engage in settlement efforts. Kmart has not indicated that the parties have attempted to resolve their disputes through private mediation, as agreed in their Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Nevertheless, in light of Plaintiffs' "willing[ness] to mediate privately," (Opp'n 3), and failure to dispute that few products have been sold to date--though the Court is mindful of Plaintiffs' concern that Kmart, as a large retailer, has the ability to sell many more Accused Products--the Court ORDERS the parties to engage in private mediation in the next 45 days and to submit a Joint Status Report on or before June 5, 2017 regarding the status of their settlement efforts. If these mediation efforts do not prove fruitful, the parties may request the Court's assistance in overseeing settlement efforts itself or in securing a Magistrate Judge to assist in helping settle the case, provided the parties can articulate a persuasive reason why they believe continued settlement efforts are warranted. (lc) Modified on 4/13/2017 (lc). Modified on 4/14/2017 (lc). |
| Filing 66 OPPOSITION re: APPLICATION for Order for Mediation With a Magistrate Judge in the Next Forty-Five (45) Days #65 filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 65 APPLICATION for Order for Mediation With a Magistrate Judge in the Next Forty-Five (45) Days filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Day, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 64 Effective April 10, 2017, Judge McDermott will be located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, COURTROOM 630 on the 6th Floor, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 630 of the Roybal Federal Building, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mailbox located outside the Clerk's Office on the 1st Floor of the Roybal Federal Building. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 63 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jennifer L Jonak on behalf of Counter Defendants Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Attorney Jennifer L Jonak added to party Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.(pty:cd), Attorney Jennifer L Jonak added to party Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Jennifer L Jonak added to party Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Jennifer L Jonak added to party Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.(pty:cd))(Jonak, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 62
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anant K. Saraswat to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. designating Bradley A Hyde as local counsel #57 by Judge S. James Otero (lc)
|
|
Filing 61
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order #50 . (san)
|
|
Filing 60
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order #49 . (san)
|
|
Filing 59
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order #48 . (san)
|
|
Filing 58
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero:This matter is before the Court on its own initiative. On January 30, 2017, Defendant KMartCorporation filed an Application for (1) Entry of Proposed Agreed Upon Scheduling Order (2) Extension of Time for Tutorial Presentation and (3) Order of Mediation with a Magistrate Judge in Next Thirty (30) Days ("Application"). (See ECF No. 51.) Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Col., Ltd., and the Regents of the University of California (together, "Plaintiffs") opposed the Application on January 31, 2017. (See ECF No. 53.) On February 1, 2017, the Court denied KMart's Application. This was done in error, and the Court accordingly STRIKES docket number 56 from the record. In light of the parties' agreement with respect to all relevant scheduling dates, as reflected in their Joint Rule 26(f) Report, (see ECF No. 46), the Court finds that a mandatory scheduling conference is not necessary at this time. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the scheduling conference date previously set for February 6, 2017 and IMPOSES the schedule described on pages 7 and 8 of the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The Court further CONTINUES the date of the technologytutorial described in docket number 41 until Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 10:00am, the week after the parties complete claim construction discovery. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR IMPOSITON OF LIMITATIONS AND OTHER SPECIFICS) (lc)
|
| Filing 57 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anant K. Saraswat to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-19288882) filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Se miconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hyde, Bradley) |
|
Filing 56
ORDER DENYING KMART CORPORATIONS APPLICATION FOR (1) ENTRY OF PROPOSED AGREED UPON SCHEDULING ORDER (2) EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TUTORIAL PRESENTATION AND(3) ORDER OF MEDIATION WITH A MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN NEXT THIRTY (30) DAYS #51 by Judge S. James Otero (lc) Modified on 2/1/2017 (lc). (STRICKEN PER 2/1/2017 MINUTE ORDER).
|
| Filing 55 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order to Dkt. 51 re Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A),, #54 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Day, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 54 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from 2/6/2017 to 45 days #51 . The following error(s) was found: Missing Proposed order which was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 53 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California. Re: APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from 2/6/2017 to 45 days #51 (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 51 APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from 2/6/2017 to 45 days filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation. (Day, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 52
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #47 by Judge S. James Otero. It is hereby ordered that Jennifer L. Jonak of JONAK LAW GROUP, P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. ("SSC") and Seoul Viosys Co., LTD. ("SVC"), may telephonically attend the Scheduling Conference in this matter calendared for 10:00 a.m. on February 6, 2017. Counsel must call the Courtroom Deputy at (213) 894-1796 to provide a direct dial number for this appearance. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
| Filing 50 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd..(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 49 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd..(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 48 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd..(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 47 REQUEST for Leave of Jennifer L. Jonak to Appear for Scheduling Conference by telephone filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. Request set for hearing on 2/6/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Appear Telephonically) (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 46 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10, filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California.. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 45 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Yakov M Zolotorev on behalf of Defendant K-Mart Corporation (Attorney Yakov M Zolotorev added to party K-Mart Corporation(pty:dft))(Zolotorev, Yakov) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Marc C Belloli on behalf of Defendant K-Mart Corporation (Attorney Marc C Belloli added to party K-Mart Corporation(pty:dft))(Belloli, Marc) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David L Alberti on behalf of Defendant K-Mart Corporation (Attorney David L Alberti added to party K-Mart Corporation(pty:dft))(Alberti, David) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 41 SCHEDULING NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero: During the Scheduling Conference, the Court wishes to have the parties provide a technology tutorial and overview of likely contested and potentially dispositive issues. The parties will have 30 minutes each to present their tutorials. The Court is particularly interested in hearing from Plaintiffs (1) how the eight (8) asserted patents are both similar to and different from one another; (2) which of Defendant's products are alleged to infringe which claims of which patents; (3) whether Spotlite America Corporation has been accused of infringing any of these patents or has filed a declaratory judgment action with respect to any of these patents. The Court is interested in hearing from Defendant (1) how its products operate; (2) a preview of its noninfringement arguments; (3) a high-level overview of Defendant's invalidity arguments; and (4) whether Defendant intends to move for inter-partes or other post-grant review. The Court is also interested in hearing from both parties which claim term(s) are most likely to be disputed and an overview of the parties' prior efforts to settle disputes involving certain of the asserted patents and accused instrumentalities. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 40
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/17/2017. Scheduling Conference set for 2/6/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 39 ANSWER to Answer to Counterclaim, #38 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd..(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 38 Corrected ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #20 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation.(Day, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 37 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #34 by Clerk of Court. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 12/2/16. (lc) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: K-Mart Counterclaim #34 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: Clerk unable to determine who the counterclaim defendants are. Counterclaim caption is Missing... body of text does not specifically name counter defendants. Docket sheet. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 35 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation (Day, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 34 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #20 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against K-Mart Corporation filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation.(Attorney Elizabeth Day added to party K-Mart Corporation(pty:dft))(Day, Elizabeth) Modified on 11/29/2016 (lc). (BOTH ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM STRICKEN PER 11/29/16 COURT RESPONSE G112B) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO SOLEY SUBSTITUTE STACEY H WANG AS PLAINTIFF, The Regents of the University of California's DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO L.R. 82-2.1.3.4 #32 by Judge S. James Otero (lc) Modified on 11/17/2016 (lc).
|
| Filing 32 APPLICATION for Order for GRANTING APPLICATION TO SUBSTITUTE DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO L.R. 82-2.1.3.4 filed by Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Stacey Hsiang Chun Wang added to party The Regents of the University of California (pty:pla)) (Wang, Stacey) |
|
Filing 31
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND K MART CORPORATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO NOVEMBER 28, 2016 #29 by Judge S. James Otero (lc)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge S. James Otero. Effective November 7, 2016, Judge Otero will be located at the 1st Street Courthouse, COURTROOM 10C on the 10th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 10C of the 1st Street Courthouse, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mail box outside the Clerk's Office on the 4th floor of the 1st Street Courthouse. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 29 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 28, 2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant K-Mart Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Matthew D Pearson added to party K-Mart Corporation(pty:dft))(Pearson, Matthew) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #27 , pdf is service on the amended complaint. The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected. The correct event is: Service of summons and complaint returned executed 21 days. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California, re Summons Issued #24 , Amended Complaint/Petition, #20 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #12 served on October 12, 2016. (Hyde, Bradley) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge S. James Otero: granting #25 Non-Resident Attorney Michael B., Michael B. of Holland & Knight LLP 31 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of The Regents of the University of California, designating Bradley A. Hyde as local counsel. (lc)
|
| Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael B. Eisenberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-18718784) filed by Plaintiff The Regents of t he University of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 24 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #20 as to defendant K-Mart Corporation. (lc) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California, (Attorney Bradley A Hyde added to party The Regents of the University of California (pty:pla))(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 22 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 21 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #20 filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 20 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant K-Mart Corporation Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., upon Defendant K-Mart Corporation served on 9/19/2016, answer due 10/11/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Judi Schutte, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sanders, Charles) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge S. James Otero: granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Charles H. Sanders APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., designating Bradley A Hyde as local counsel. (lc)
|
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles H. Sanders to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-18559427) #14 Corrected Certificate of Good Standing filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hyde, Bradley) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge S. James Otero: granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence J Gotts APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., designating Bradley A Hyde as local counsel. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles H. Sanders to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-18559427) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Certificate of Good standing from Commonwealth of Massachusetts is undated. (lt) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles H. Sanders to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-18559427) filed by Plaintiffs Seoul S emiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence J. Gotts to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-18558721) filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Se miconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hyde, Bradley) |
|
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge George H. King. Case transferred from Judge George H. King to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:16-cv-06782 SJO (JEMx). (rrp)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence J. Gotts. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Charles H. Sanders. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant K-Mart Corporation. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. King and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. identifying Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., identifying Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., The Regents of the University of California, Natalie Fellows DeMille, Steven P. DenBaars, Shuji Nakamura. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Hyde, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-18521836 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8) (Attorney Bradley A Hyde added to party Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Bradley A Hyde added to party Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Hyde, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
