Krystal Jasmin v. Santa Monica Police Department et al
Krystal Jasmin |
CSW Jeweutt Bright, Officer Cochran, Does, CSW Jamie Hein, Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services and Santa Monica Police Department |
2:2016cv06999 |
September 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 154 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin for Motions 106 , 107 , Requests 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 126 , 127 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motions (Dkt. 106, 107) are DENIED; 2. The Related Requests (Dkt. 112, 113, 114, 115, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 126, 127) are DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 105 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the Orders Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Krystal Jasmin shall take nothing by her Second Amended Compla int; 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to defendants the City of Santa Monica, the Santa Monica Police Department, Officer Cochran, and Officer Jauregui; 3. This action is dismissed without prejudice as to defendants Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Jeweutt Bright, Stephanie Rush, Jamie Hein, and DOES 1-10. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.