R.J., a minor v. City of Los Angeles et al
| R. J. |
| City of Los Angeles, DOES and Officer Derek Leiphardt |
| 2:2016cv07232 |
| September 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PENDING MOTIONS by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Still pending before the Court are the parties motions in limine and motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 60, 67, 84-89, 93-97.) In light of the Courts Ord er granting the petition for approval of the disposition of the proceeds of the settlement entered in favor of minor Plaintiff R.J. (Dkt. No. 108), the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than December 19, 2018, why the pending mot ions should not be withdrawn by the parties or dismissed without prejudice. If the parties agree to withdraw the motions, the parties may file a stipulation to withdraw the motions. Said stipulation shall be a proper response to this Order to Show Cause. The Court further orders the parties to file a joint status report regarding settlement no later than January 28, 2019. (shb)
|
|
Filing
35
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. In re: Stipulation for Protective Order 34 (mkr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
