Canyon View Limited v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, et al
| Canyon View Limited |
| All Persons Unknown, California Reconveyance Company, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association Co. |
| 2:2016cv07233 |
| September 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S. James Otero |
| Alka Sagar |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 34 by Judge S. James Otero: Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs Canyon View Limited against and against defendants California Reconveyance Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on the Complaints claims for (1) quiet title, (2) declaratory relief, and (3) removal of cloud on title. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTIES AND INSTRUMENT NUMBERS AND INSTRUCTIONS RE CANCELLING OF DOCUMENTS RECORDED BY DEFENDANTS AND OR MERS AGAINST SAID PROPE RTIES AND DEADLINES THERETO). Judgment is hereby entered for compensatory damages in the sum of $100.00 for Plaintiff and against Defendants. Defendants shall pay this sum, plus any attorneys fees and costs that may be awarded to Plaintiff by the Courts Order to be made on Plaintiffs Fee Motion to be filed after entry of the Judgment (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
