Ricky Gamble v. S. Hatton
Petitioner: Ricky Gamble
Respondent: S. Hatton
Case Number: 2:2016cv07365
Filed: September 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero, Related to 8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the related Memorandum and Order Summarily Dismissing Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and Denying Certificate of Appealability. 1 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricky Gamble v. S. Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricky Gamble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?